Housing – Local authority houses. A minded to letter, indicating an intention to make a decision contrary to the interests of the applicant for homelessness assistance, did not have to specify in terms that the applicant (or a representative) might make representations to the reviewer orally at a face-to-face meeting. Accordingly, the Court of Appeal, Civil Division, dismissed the appellants' appeals against decisions of county courts in their subsequent challenges to review decisions.
This Summary is from Counsel Website
Articles About The Case